Group sues district for public records related to ethnic studies

June 25, 2023
related case
Concernered Jewish Parents and Teachers of LA

A pro-Israel law firm has sued the Mountain View-Los Altos Union High School District for allegedly withholding records related to a pro-Palestinian consultant who was hired to train teachers on Ethnic Studies.

The Deborah Project, which has challenged California’s Ethnic Studies curriculum claiming it was antisemitic, filed a California Public Records Act request on Feb. 23 asking for training materials presented to teachers by Acosta Educational Partners, or AEP.

It’s been more than 14 weeks since then, and the district still hasn’t said whether it has any records or is working on the request, according to the lawsuit. The district is preventing the public from learning what is actually being taught, the lawsuit says.

Superintendent Nellie Meyer has declined interviews throughout the Ethnic Studies controversy and didn’t respond to another request for comment yesterday. The school board used a $45,000 state grant to hire AEP on Nov. 17. The contract was on the consent calendar, which is a list of items that can be approved on a single vote without discussion.

Board President Phil Faillace later said that the item’s description and place on the consent calendar misled the board into thinking it was non-controversial.

But in February, more than 400 people signed a petition saying that AEP should be fired for pushing anti-Zionist and anti-Semitic lessons.

AEP encourages teachers to “shut their doors” so they can push controversial material, and its owner, Curtis Acosta. Acosta is connected to the Teach Palestine Project, which parents said in a letter to the board is “a blatantly antisemitic source of lesson plans for teachers.”

“In modern America, Jews are too often dismissed as European colonizers or white people,” parent Mark Balch told the board. “We have every right to be treated with the same protections as any other ethnic group.”

Data on firing sought

AEP was quietly fired after the meeting, but the Deborah Project wants to better understand what happened before then.

“While the contract was apparently terminated, no public information discloses whether AEP completed the work it was retained to do, what AEP work product or information was imparted to MV-LAUHSD and how that work product or information is being used,” attorney David DeGroot wrote in the lawsuit.

In its public records request, Deborah Project legal director Lori Lowenthal Marcus asked for records going back to Jan. 1, 2018, with eight key words: Ethnic Studies, Zionism, Zionists, Israel, Palestine, Palestinians, Arabs and Arab-Americans.

Missed the deadline

The California Public Record Act gives agencies 10 days to give an initial response that says whether the records exist and how long it could take to gather them. The law allows for a 14-day extension if needed.

But the district took 34 days to give an initial response, according to he lawsuit.

“The district will require additional time to fully respond,” executive assistant Debbie Maher said in a March 29 email that was attached to the lawsuit.

Maher said she would get back to the Deborah Project by April 7, but the district still hasn’t responded, according to the lawsuit filed on June 7.

The Deborah Project is asking a judge to order the district to immediately produce the records, or to prepare a list of withheld records and show why they shouldn’t be released.

View source

Submit Case

Please fill out the form, providing a brief description of the incident.
One of our attorneys will review your submission and contact you to arrange a call for further discussion.
If you or someone you know has experienced antisemitism in education, we encourage you to share your story with The Deborah Project so that we can provide advice about whether the legal rights of Jews have been violated and if so, what options there are for moving forward.
Thank you! Your submission has been received and we will contact you soon!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

FAQs

We’re here to help. Check out some of our most frequently asked questions. And if you don’t find what you’re looking for, be sure to contact someone from our team.
Is antisemitism in school settings illegal?
Acts of Antisemitism can be the basis of a legal violation, so long as those acts create an interference with the ability to do one's job or to participate in one's educational experience.
Don't teachers have free speech rights, so they can't be punished for saying antisemitic things?
K-12 public school teachers do NOT have free speech rights in the classroom or whenever they are performing their official duties. Private school teachers have greater leeway, as do college professors.
Do anti-Zionist/anti-Israel assertions constitute a violation of anti-discrimination laws?
It depends. The U.S. government has slowly begun to recognize that anti-Zionism can constitute antisemitism, and so is subject to anti-discrimination laws, when such hostility goes beyond merely criticizing the Israeli government for various policies but instead attacks Zionists or Israelis for things the speaker doesn't criticize other countries for doing. This is why it is so important for institutions and governments to adopt the IHRA working definition of antisemitism and its examples.
Discrimination in education is governed by Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. But Title VI doesn't include religion as a protected category. So is antisemitism not considered discriminatory under Title VI?
Someone who is Jewish and believes that Israel has the right to exist as a Jewish state may have a claim under Title VI under the protected categories of Shared Ancestry and Ethnicity.

Contact Us

Have questions? We’re here to help! Fill the form or contact us anytime for assistance.
Thank you! Your submission has been received and we will contact you soon!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.