Cease-And-Desist Letter Sent to Oakland Schools Over Anti-Israel “Teach-In”

December 6, 2023
related case
Concernered Jewish Parents and Teachers of LA

A cease-and-desist letter was sent to Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) on Tuesday, demanding the school cancel Wednesday’s anti-Israel “Teach-In” scheduled to take place across the school district.

The letter, which was obtained by the Journal, was authored by The Deborah Project, a law firm providing pro bono legal services to Jewish and Israeli students who believe they have been discriminated against on campus. The Deborah Project is representing Oakland Families United Against Antisemitism, a group that includes parents of OUSD students.

The letter informs the district they expect the OUSD to “safeguard the students of this district from the biased and discriminatory material that certain members of the Oakland Educators Association have made known they will be inflicting on those students in their planned December 6 Teach-In.” The letter notes the Teach-In’s takeover, of OUSD classrooms, despite the Oakland School Board and the OUSD Superintendent’s public declaration  that the material violates School Board policy.

The letter refers to a statement OUSD Superintendent Dr. Kyla Johnson-Trammel made to OUSD families on Monday. Johnson-Trammel’s statement read in part: “I know that many of you are aware of the unsanctioned Teach-In planned by outside organizing in our schools this Wednesday, December 6. I want to make clear that the District does not authorize this action. Furthermore, I want to make clear that the instructional materials developed and shared by the Teach-In organizers are not aligned with the materials and guidance previously provided by our Chief Academic Officer, Dr. Sondra Aguilera. Our schools are sanctuaries for learning, and I am deeply disappointed by the harmful and divisive materials being circulated and promoted as factual.” (emphasis original)

Among the material in the Teach-In includes a YouTube video titled, “Why is Israel called an ‘apartheid’ state?” and a read-along of the book “P is for Palestine,” which includes a page states: “I is for Intifada, Intifada is Arabic for rising up for what is right, whether you are a kid or a grownup!” Additionally, a “History of Palestine and Zionism” slideshow features a slide with the question, “Since Jews experienced centuries of violence and ethnic cleansing, why are Jews in Israel doing the same thing to Palestinians today?”

Lori Lowenthal Marcus, legal director of The Deborah Project, told the Journal that the Teach-In of such material will be happening “in their classrooms, on the campuses of the schools. We don’t know how many of the teachers will do this, but a vote by the OEA [Oakland Educators Association] last night ratified the decision to go through with this.”

The Oakland Educators Association is “categorically wrong when it claims teachers have free speech rights in their classrooms. They do not,” the cease-and-desist letter continued. “The ninth circuit held in Johnson v. Poway Unified School District … that teachers do not have free speech rights in the classrooms or whenever they are acting in their official capacity. Full Stop. This case is directly binding on all public-school teachers in California and it applies the holding in Garcetti v. Ceballos … that public employees do not have free speech rights while performing their official tasks.”

The letter also argued that the planned Teach-In will also foster a hostile climate against Jewish students on campus, thus violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. The Deborah Project contended that the district has an “obligation to keep out of our public schools material that discriminates against Jewish children and Israeli children.” “We know — indeed, the Superintendent Johnson-Trammell has declared — that the planned Teach-In will place into the California public schools for which you are responsible curricular material that violates these laws and so discriminates against Jewish children and Israeli children, including the children of the members of Oakland Families United Against Antisemitism.” The letter continued, “If you fail to fulfill your duty to prevent this, we will hold each of you who allowed this to happen morally, politically, and legally responsible for the harm that ensues.”

Marcus told the Journal “what parents, teachers and school administrators need to understand is that public school teachers do not have the right of free speech in the classroom, or at any time while they are acting in their official capacity.”

The OUSD and OEA have not responded to the Journal’s requests for comment.

View source

Submit Case

Please fill out the form, providing a brief description of the incident.
One of our attorneys will review your submission and contact you to arrange a call for further discussion.
If you or someone you know has experienced antisemitism in education, we encourage you to share your story with The Deborah Project so that we can provide advice about whether the legal rights of Jews have been violated and if so, what options there are for moving forward.
Thank you! Your submission has been received and we will contact you soon!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

FAQs

We’re here to help. Check out some of our most frequently asked questions. And if you don’t find what you’re looking for, be sure to contact someone from our team.
Is antisemitism in school settings illegal?
Acts of Antisemitism can be the basis of a legal violation, so long as those acts create an interference with the ability to do one's job or to participate in one's educational experience.
Don't teachers have free speech rights, so they can't be punished for saying antisemitic things?
K-12 public school teachers do NOT have free speech rights in the classroom or whenever they are performing their official duties. Private school teachers have greater leeway, as do college professors.
Do anti-Zionist/anti-Israel assertions constitute a violation of anti-discrimination laws?
It depends. The U.S. government has slowly begun to recognize that anti-Zionism can constitute antisemitism, and so is subject to anti-discrimination laws, when such hostility goes beyond merely criticizing the Israeli government for various policies but instead attacks Zionists or Israelis for things the speaker doesn't criticize other countries for doing. This is why it is so important for institutions and governments to adopt the IHRA working definition of antisemitism and its examples.
Discrimination in education is governed by Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. But Title VI doesn't include religion as a protected category. So is antisemitism not considered discriminatory under Title VI?
Someone who is Jewish and believes that Israel has the right to exist as a Jewish state may have a claim under Title VI under the protected categories of Shared Ancestry and Ethnicity.

Contact Us

Have questions? We’re here to help! Fill the form or contact us anytime for assistance.
Thank you! Your submission has been received and we will contact you soon!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.